ProfitMaster Displays

11 SEP 2026

James Parker · Graphics Coordinator

Four questions,
answered.

Scott — you asked me four questions. These are my answers, with the evidence behind each one, so we can spend the time talking rather than me explaining.

FIVE WEEKS IN · 53 MEETINGS ON RECORD · EVERY FIGURE SOURCED

Estimates are marked as estimates. Where I am guessing, it says so.

The short version

Q1 – Q4

01
Describe your role. What are your responsibilities?
Graphics Coordinator. I process artwork from the customer for approval, and manage the artwork from receiving to final approval. I am essentially quality control. I was additionally hired for special projects. I am my own department in a sense.
02
What does ProfitMaster do really well?
ProfitMaster does relationships and quality control very well. We serve our customers really well.
03
What makes your job unnecessarily difficult?
It's difficult when the exception is the rule.
04
If you were CEO, what is the first thing you would fix?
Tracking — with brand ecosystem redevelopment as a second.

The next five slides are the evidence behind those four answers, in the order you asked them. Stop me anywhere.

Question one · my role

Graphics Coordinator

I process artwork from the customer
for approval, and manage it from
receiving to final approval.

I am essentially quality control. And I was additionally hired for special projects — so I am my own department in a sense.

The artwork. Every file a customer sends goes through me before it reaches a press. On the map that is 9 of the 23 steps and 3 of the 5 approval gates, and all three rework loops start at one of those gates.

Special projects. Helping develop better processes and better systems of management and information dissemination, and helping coordinate maintaining and updating the ProfitMaster brand. I also manage the catalogue, the website and all branding touchpoints.

Why the role exists

"The design guys — the senior guys, Dave and Anthony — were spending so much time on that nonsense. They weren't doing their real job."

Deron, 2 September 2026

The two halves connect. The gate is where artwork quality gets checked, and the brand touchpoints are what that artwork ends up in. The catalogue is only as good as the artwork index behind it.

Five weeks in, the special-projects half has produced the brand audit, the logo chronology, the die-line manifest and catalogue, the graphics-process map, and the S-code index — all built read-only against the Design share.

Question two · what we do well

Relationships

We are a relationship business —
and we catch our own mistakes
before the customer sees one.

Relationships

Ron founded this company on his Coca-Cola contacts. Twenty years ago we hired a designer because bottlers were asking for custom work. The business has never been won on price.

And it is not one relationship — it is Coke proper plus every independent bottler, held separately. It runs to our vendors too: "I've been working with David and Anthony since 2003."

It's a relationship on both sides.03 August 2026

This is the asset. What stops us entering new categories is not equipment — it is that we do not have relationships there yet.

Quality control

Did we reject the proof? I don't think my customer rejected the proof.A salesperson · 01 Sep
That was a hard proof. We rejected that.The project manager
10
expensive mistakes caught in five weeks
0
late to a customer, in five weeks of meetings
23 YRS
with our principal converter
95%
"We've got such a good team. 95% of the time it's all perfect."

Not one of those ten saves is recorded anywhere as a save. They exist only because the meetings were recorded — the thing we are best at is the thing we have no record of.

Question three · what is difficult

Exceptions

It is difficult when
the exception is the rule.

The exceptions become the rule after a while, and now we end up with this really strange system that has no rules. We have rules — but we also break every one, for reasons. Twenty-nine years here · 01 September 2026

The written rule is that we do not edit customer artwork. In practice it is most of my week. The rule says one thing, the ship date says another, and the ship date wins every time — correctly.

That is why checking one component takes thirty minutes, and a two-hundred-piece programme costs about a hundred hours. Nothing arrives the same way twice.

What it actually costs

You cannot write a process for an exception. So it never gets written, never gets trained, and never gets handed over.

It all lives in people's heads — and the last time a head left, it took the whole S-code index with it: "he retired, with his decades… now, with him gone, it's exposed that nobody knows what is going on."

The exception is why we win the work. It is also why none of it is written down.

The cause is not carelessness — our customers change fast and we react fast. Any fix has to protect that, not remove it. A process that made us slower to say yes would cost more than it saves.

Question four · what I would fix

The vision

First: tracking.
Second: rebuild the brand ecosystem.

01 · Tracking

One identity per job, first email to last carton. Prototypes, die lines, artwork and multi-vendor programmes under one reference.

Today there is no serialised code linking design to production. S-codes are issued for accounting, sometimes before the art exists.

41%
of the S-code register matched to artwork by guess
9,265
products in FileMaker; ~9,000 obsolete

Already live — combining the PM number and the S-code came up on 2 September.

Open the tracking indexes →

02 · The brand ecosystem

One identity for the company, the same way. Catalogue, website, collateral and every touchpoint rebuilt on one system.

Today: ~45 logo files spanning 2005 to 2025 with no master, no standards guide that has ever existed, and 257 files still carrying our old address against 23 current.

The order is not arbitrary. You cannot rebuild the brand ecosystem until you can find what you own. Tracking is the precondition — and it is the half of my job I was hired to do anyway.

Neither needs budget, headcount or new software. Both need one thing: that whatever we build reads what people already produce. Four systems have been tried here and dropped — every one asked people to type more than the work justified. As one project manager put it: "it was overcooked."

What I would like from you

07 / 07

The ask

One date, and
one decision.

Everything on the last five slides I can carry myself. This is the one thing that needs you.

The date

Restart the mapping session — the one that measures how long each handoff actually waits.

Two hours a fortnight. Four hours a month. We are a quarter of the way through, and it has been stalled for over a month.

No budget. No headcount. No software. No new forms.

The decision

That tracking is the first thing I work on, with the brand ecosystem second.

I have built the two indexes already, read-only. What I need is your agreement that this is the priority, so it stops being a special project and becomes the system.

Six weeks, then I come back with the measured case.

And one question back to you. You have walked into this from the outside too, five weeks after I did. What is the first thing you would fix? If we are seeing the same thing, that is worth knowing now rather than in six months.

Open the tracking indexes →   Every figure in this deck came from a recorded meeting. The good lines are all quotes from people here — I just wrote them down.